From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: time to create the GDB 8.1.x branch?
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0347eb6-0299-2a84-a25e-7e6e28cf3e5e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120191510.clz2ywdyknuftzrh@adacore.com>
Joel,
On 11/20/2017 07:15 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it is time to start thinking about the next release (8.1),
> as it has been 5.5 months since we release 8.0, and 7 months
> since we created the 8.0.x branch!
>
> I've created the following wiki page for keeping track of this release
> cycle:
>
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_8.1_Release
>
> Looking at the gdb/NEWS file, it shows a fair number of enhancements.
> Also, outside of one GDB PR that was marked for 8.1 but is no longer
> critical IMO, we have no PR active targetting 8.1.
>
> Are there any changes that would be worth waiting for before we branch
> 8.1? If not, I plan on creating the branch next Monday (Nov 27th).
Can we consider delaying the branching some more time? E.g., at least
a week? I'm not certain I'll be able to address all of Keith's comments
on the wildmatching series this week (and I'd very much like to get it in
because the sooner we have that in a release, the sooner we can move
gdb to a C++ namespace), and also, a lot of folks in the US are off for
thanksgiving this week (including Keith :-). There are a few other pending
patches that I'd like to try to get in (patches that have already been posted
but are waiting for review, e.g., DWARF5 indexes, Keith's inline
breakpoint and ptype patches, etc.), and next Monday is just looking too
tight.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-20 19:15 Joel Brobecker
2017-11-21 10:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-11-27 21:55 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-28 19:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-11-28 20:32 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 13:20 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 21:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-29 21:49 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 22:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-21 11:10 ` Yao Qi
2017-11-21 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-27 22:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-27 22:41 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 20:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-29 22:20 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 22:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-22 13:07 ` Yao Qi
2017-11-27 22:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-27 22:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-28 12:38 ` Yao Qi
2017-11-29 20:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-22 18:03 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-27 22:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-28 17:08 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-23 15:16 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-11-23 16:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-11-23 17:32 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0347eb6-0299-2a84-a25e-7e6e28cf3e5e@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox