Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Add gdbpy_borrowed_ref
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:02:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amNUT5wOqLWlqYeK@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tsrjh4g6.fsf@tromey.com>

Hi Tom and Matthieu,

On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 12:19:37PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Matthieu" == Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com> writes:
> 
> >> This adds new gdbpy_opt_borrowed_ref and gdbpy_borrowed_ref classes.
> >> These classes are primarily for code "documentation" purposes -- it
> >> makes it clear to the reader that a given reference is borrowed.
> >> However, they also add a tiny bit of safety, in that conversion to
> >> gdbpy_ref<> will either be rejected (by the "opt" class) or acquire a
> >> new reference.
> 
> Matthieu> Any idea when this patch could land on master ?
> 
> It's hard to say.
> 
> For ordinary-ish patches, I tend to wait a couple of weeks and then just
> check them in if they haven't been commented on.
> 
> For something like this, though, I'd normally wait and/or ping it until
> there's some review; the difference being that a big change to how new
> Python code should be written ought to have some buy-in.
> 
> I suppose I could land this particular one sooner.  That's a little
> weird since it's not actually used by anything.  OTOH it unblocks stuff
> you're doing.

I think this has been in review for a while. If there is nothing that
needs to be fixed in this patch, could we go ahead? There is a lot of
other work that is blocked and that we'd like to progress.

Thanks,
Yury


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-21 23:27 [PATCH v3 0/4] Python safety initial work Tom Tromey
2026-05-21 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Add gdbpy_borrowed_ref Tom Tromey
2026-06-01 10:00   ` Matthieu Longo
2026-06-03 18:19     ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-24 12:02       ` Yury Khrustalev [this message]
2026-06-29 13:51   ` Matthieu Longo
2026-05-21 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Add wrappers for some Python APIs Tom Tromey
2026-05-21 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Add wrappers for Python implementation functions and methods Tom Tromey
2026-05-21 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Convert py-tui.c to the "python safety" approach Tom Tromey
2026-06-12 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Python safety initial work Tom Tromey
2026-07-19 17:16   ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-21 11:45     ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amNUT5wOqLWlqYeK@arm.com \
    --to=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=matthieu.longo@arm.com \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox