From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id DWp1J0xYVGkMiR8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 17:55:08 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 918151E08D; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 17:55:08 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D98D1E08D for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 17:55:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6606D4BA2E33 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:54:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6606D4BA2E33 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [78.133.224.34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DDB4BA2E04; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:54:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 96DDB4BA2E04 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=orcam.me.uk Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=orcam.me.uk ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 96DDB4BA2E04 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=78.133.224.34 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1767135275; cv=none; b=rqjQCn5ebVd91eyB3zYgvNzjjzwC0QD8+fw+RrCfDW5xqB/fbLEfoyY5UpZani8gR2F71a/7gDmO4ydE4qG9tIJuto3MYtZ8mAe7vfLZXhqx4YgwvuKgdPU9Cgb6fshfhKPm2Ho6HKf5OCJsxHuTEigvYihg5oOQ6LyLJzKupcs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1767135275; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7wJg0+r5W2/UCtoFiAUiU0xzrbFgHaXecOLUbikAGjY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Psl178aBLFs7n6BFPXU8Oc/JdT27uld1p6JfcZBL4X3CnpH2OUSnbheZf9dv51wdLQH+VBWAjsv4+iAbOIRZcK3eByH97AoE02yoyxAJFwa+nbRghDFWsISh5ZNEXFNw3+fUtDPG+DgdZouPXwl60sl9xlWgARJNO8BCBvZgIjc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 96DDB4BA2E04 Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6E5E192009C; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 23:54:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6478592009B; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:54:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 22:54:34 +0000 (GMT) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Alan Modra cc: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] binutils-gdb/git: Handle *.ac and *.m4 files in .gitattributes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20251203085111.3655102-1-tdevries@suse.de> <93deb8ec-db69-425a-9a56-30f802363b1b@suse.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org [+cc GCC] On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, Alan Modra wrote: > I'll rubber-stamp this for the binutils side, but IMO there is no need > for a global gdb maintainer to wait for approval from binutils > maintainers for this shared file. Should this be documented in top-level MAINTAINERS? Should this file be kept in sync with GCC? Maciej