Re: [RFC][13/19] Target FP: Perform Ada fixed-point scaling in target format

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Simon Marchi wrote:

> > Let's wait for people who really know better about C++ to tell us
> > whether it makes a difference. I was amazed as how careful you have
> > to be when using C++ to avoid inefficiencies, but perhaps I am simply
> > being paranoid in this case... That's why I tried to phrase this as
> > a question.
> > 
> 
> Indeed, it's preferable to use
> 
>   std::string foo = returns_string ();
> 
> than
> 
>   std::string foo;
>   foo = returns_string ();
> 
> The reason being that in the second case, the default constructor (the
> one with no params) is called to construct an empty string, and then that
> work is scrapped because we assign a new value.  The first form constructs
> the string right away with the right content.

 Hmm, wouldn't a half-decent compiler notice that the result produced by 
the default constructor is discarded and optimise the call away?  Also has 
there actually been an assertion in (the current definition of C++) that 
all declared objects have also been initialised?

  Maciej the curious