From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-142014-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22499 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2017 09:48:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 21448 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2017 09:48:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:475, among
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com
Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:48:53 +0000
Received: from HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.19])	by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 0A506237BC19A;	Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:48:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.20.78.95] (10.20.78.95) by HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:48:50 +0100
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:48:00 -0000
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
CC: <binutils@sourceware.org>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Pedro Alves	<palves@redhat.com>, Djordje Todorovic <djordje.todorovic@rt-rk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ELF/BFD: Handle both variants of the 64-bit Linux core PRPSINFO note
In-Reply-To: <87k20nwu42.fsf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1709251046000.16752@tp.orcam.me.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1709220216120.16752@tp.orcam.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1709230018120.16752@tp.orcam.me.uk> <878th6xj8q.fsf@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1709242231080.16752@tp.orcam.me.uk> <87k20nwu42.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00748.txt.bz2

On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:

> Sure, thanks for explaining.  I understand it's a matter of taste and as
> I said, it's really a nitpick.  I still think the patch is good as is
> and a nice improvement to the current situation.

 FAOD, among `prpsinfo32_ugid16', `prpsinfo32_ugid32', `prpsinfo64_ugid16' 
and `prpsinfo64_ugid32' what order did you have in mind?

  Maciej