From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87867 invoked by alias); 5 May 2017 20:08:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 87812 invoked by uid 89); 5 May 2017 20:08:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mailapp01.imgtec.com Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com (HELO mailapp01.imgtec.com) (195.59.15.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2017 20:08:30 +0000 Received: from HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.19]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 7FE5515365FE8; Fri, 5 May 2017 21:08:26 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.20.78.191] (10.20.78.191) by HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Fri, 5 May 2017 21:08:30 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 20:08:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: John Baldwin CC: , Pedro Alves , Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Don't throw an error in 'info registers' for unavailable MIPS GP registers. In-Reply-To: <1732755.e2u3aPx1km@ralph.baldwin.cx> Message-ID: References: <20170412183727.22483-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1615766.4Mx9RcRn3g@ralph.baldwin.cx> <1732755.e2u3aPx1km@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 On Fri, 5 May 2017, John Baldwin wrote: > > However, as you note, the primary goal is removing the error(), and I can > > live with any format that is readable. > > Any other thoughts on "" vs "" vs always using the 64-bit > table layout vs ? I've been busy with binutils stuff recently, sorry. I'll try to have a look again next week. Maciej