Re: [PATCH 0/2] gdb: Require a C++11 compiler

Pedro Alves
2016-11-02T15:58:52Z

On 11/02/2016 02:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 01/11/16 16:53, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 11/01/2016 11:00 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I have to say I think this is too soon (having just found out the
>>> hard way) :-( ).
>>
>> Sorry for causing you trouble. :-(
>>
>>> Half of the machines I use are still running RHE5 and this change means
>>> I can no-longer use the system compiler for building GDB. A change that
>>> requires use of a non-standard compiler significantly complicates the
>>> process of building (and worse, productizing) GDB builds as now you have
>>
>> Fortunately, there are gcc 4.8 packages for RHEL5 in DTS2:
>>
>
> Which are not installed on any of our machines and, frankly, I wouldn't
> want to take a wager on persuading our IT admins to do that. :-( It's
> certainly unlikely to happen in short order.

I don't want to sound presumptuous, but I can't imagine why they'd refuse
to install a RH-validated package on a RH system, package which was made
exactly for purposes like the one at hand. C++11 is only becoming more
common and a dependency of many upstream projects. clang/llvm just
recently started requiring gcc 4.8 too (for full C++11 support),
for example.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves