Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>,
	Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>,
	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: PR13984 - gdb stops controlling a thread after "Remote 'g' packet reply is too long: ..." error message
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1604142148090.21846@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570EC0C0.8030500@redhat.com>

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:

> However, we can see that gdb 7.4 expects more registers, as expected, and
> that it expects registers up till register 89:
>  
> ...
>  ''           88   88    704       8 int64_t              88         704
>  ''           89   89    712       8 int64_t              89         712
> ...
> 
> while 7.6 expects registers up till register number 78:
> 
> ...
>  ''           77   77    616       8 int64_t              77         616
>  ''           78   78    624       8 int64_t              78         624
> ...
> 
> I'd compare "info all-registers" to paint a more complete picture.
> 
> Looking at current master's mips-tdep.c, we see:
> 
> static struct gdbarch *
> mips_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
> {
> ...
>   else if (info.osabi == GDB_OSABI_LINUX)
>     {
> ...
>       num_regs = 79;
> ...
>     }
>   else
>     {
>       num_regs = MIPS_LAST_EMBED_REGNUM + 1;
> ...
>     }
> ...
> 
> And in mips-tdep.h, we see:
> 
> ...
>   MIPS_LAST_EMBED_REGNUM = 89	/* Last one.  */
> ...
> 
> So, bingo, it seems?  Old gdbserver is sending the embedded layout,
> while newer gdb expects the linux-specific layout.

 I agree this is the reason of the failure.

> In current master we have:
> 
> static void
> mips_register_g_packet_guesses (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> {
>   /* If the size matches the set of 32-bit or 64-bit integer registers,
>      assume that's what we've got.  */
>   register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 38 * 4, mips_tdesc_gp32);
>   register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 38 * 8, mips_tdesc_gp64);
> 
>   /* If the size matches the full set of registers GDB traditionally
>      knows about, including floating point, for either 32-bit or
>      64-bit, assume that's what we've got.  */
>   register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 90 * 4, mips_tdesc_gp32);
>   register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 90 * 8, mips_tdesc_gp64);
> 
>   /* Otherwise we don't have a useful guess.  */
> }
> 
> 
> Specifically, the:
> 
>  register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 90 * 8, mips_tdesc_gp64);
> 
> line should match this.  So seems like this _should_ be working.

 Nope, the culprit is here:

  /* Record the maximum possible size of the g packet - it may turn out
     to be smaller.  */
  rsa->sizeof_g_packet = map_regcache_remote_table (gdbarch, rsa->regs);

and then in `map_regcache_remote_table':

  for (regnum = 0; regnum < gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch); regnum++)

-- so for a non-described Linux target `sizeof_g_packet' is initially 
capped at (79 * 8) and cannot be grown to (90 * 8) as the first `g' reply 
is seen, because growing is not allowed in the remote target.

 So it's:

commit 1faeff088bbbd037d7769d214378b4faf805fa2e
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date:   Thu Mar 1 22:19:48 2012 +0000

which needs fixing, as you've correctly identified in a later reply.

 I think I know what to do there and I'll post a proposed fix shortly.

 NB this is not related to PR gdb/13984 as that bug report is about the 
x86-64 target.

  Maciej


      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-10 14:49 Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-11 21:19 ` Luis Machado
2016-04-12  5:16   ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-12 13:37     ` Luis Machado
2016-04-13  5:43       ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-13 19:11         ` Luis Machado
2016-04-13 20:07           ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-13 20:27             ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-13 20:52               ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-13 21:57                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-14  8:33                   ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-14  9:07                     ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-14  9:22                       ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-14  9:39                         ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-14  9:47                           ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-14 21:21                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1604142148090.21846@tp.orcam.me.uk \
    --to=macro@imgtec.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=orgads@gmail.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox