From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>,
Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>,
<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: PR13984 - gdb stops controlling a thread after "Remote 'g' packet reply is too long: ..." error message
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1604142148090.21846@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570EC0C0.8030500@redhat.com>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Pedro Alves wrote:
> However, we can see that gdb 7.4 expects more registers, as expected, and
> that it expects registers up till register 89:
>
> ...
> '' 88 88 704 8 int64_t 88 704
> '' 89 89 712 8 int64_t 89 712
> ...
>
> while 7.6 expects registers up till register number 78:
>
> ...
> '' 77 77 616 8 int64_t 77 616
> '' 78 78 624 8 int64_t 78 624
> ...
>
> I'd compare "info all-registers" to paint a more complete picture.
>
> Looking at current master's mips-tdep.c, we see:
>
> static struct gdbarch *
> mips_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
> {
> ...
> else if (info.osabi == GDB_OSABI_LINUX)
> {
> ...
> num_regs = 79;
> ...
> }
> else
> {
> num_regs = MIPS_LAST_EMBED_REGNUM + 1;
> ...
> }
> ...
>
> And in mips-tdep.h, we see:
>
> ...
> MIPS_LAST_EMBED_REGNUM = 89 /* Last one. */
> ...
>
> So, bingo, it seems? Old gdbserver is sending the embedded layout,
> while newer gdb expects the linux-specific layout.
I agree this is the reason of the failure.
> In current master we have:
>
> static void
> mips_register_g_packet_guesses (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> {
> /* If the size matches the set of 32-bit or 64-bit integer registers,
> assume that's what we've got. */
> register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 38 * 4, mips_tdesc_gp32);
> register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 38 * 8, mips_tdesc_gp64);
>
> /* If the size matches the full set of registers GDB traditionally
> knows about, including floating point, for either 32-bit or
> 64-bit, assume that's what we've got. */
> register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 90 * 4, mips_tdesc_gp32);
> register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 90 * 8, mips_tdesc_gp64);
>
> /* Otherwise we don't have a useful guess. */
> }
>
>
> Specifically, the:
>
> register_remote_g_packet_guess (gdbarch, 90 * 8, mips_tdesc_gp64);
>
> line should match this. So seems like this _should_ be working.
Nope, the culprit is here:
/* Record the maximum possible size of the g packet - it may turn out
to be smaller. */
rsa->sizeof_g_packet = map_regcache_remote_table (gdbarch, rsa->regs);
and then in `map_regcache_remote_table':
for (regnum = 0; regnum < gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch); regnum++)
-- so for a non-described Linux target `sizeof_g_packet' is initially
capped at (79 * 8) and cannot be grown to (90 * 8) as the first `g' reply
is seen, because growing is not allowed in the remote target.
So it's:
commit 1faeff088bbbd037d7769d214378b4faf805fa2e
Author: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date: Thu Mar 1 22:19:48 2012 +0000
which needs fixing, as you've correctly identified in a later reply.
I think I know what to do there and I'll post a proposed fix shortly.
NB this is not related to PR gdb/13984 as that bug report is about the
x86-64 target.
Maciej
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-10 14:49 Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-11 21:19 ` Luis Machado
2016-04-12 5:16 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-12 13:37 ` Luis Machado
2016-04-13 5:43 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-13 19:11 ` Luis Machado
2016-04-13 20:07 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-13 20:27 ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-13 20:52 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-13 21:57 ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-14 8:33 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-14 9:07 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-14 9:22 ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-14 9:39 ` Orgad Shaneh
2016-04-14 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2016-04-14 21:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1604142148090.21846@tp.orcam.me.uk \
--to=macro@imgtec.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=orgads@gmail.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox