From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7257 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2014 15:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7231 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2014 15:50:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:50:45 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1XRkAM-0001t2-5k from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:50:42 -0700 Received: from localhost (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:50:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:50:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Pedro Alves CC: Ulrich Weigand , Joel Brobecker , GDB Patches Subject: Re: eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left. In-Reply-To: <54106C61.7040400@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <201409101445.s8AEjILM007935@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <54106C61.7040400@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Pedro Alves wrote: > Meanwhile, I'd prefer removing deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint > now rather than keeping it just for IRIX. I may send a > best-effort-but-untested patch for IRIX. If things break, it'd be > the job of whoever shows up as wanting to maintain IRIX to > fix and modernize things further. WDYT? FWIW I have no objections to this plan. I wonder if there's anything special here actually or if it's just that nobody bothered to convert this code to using `create_internal_breakpoint' or suchlike. Maciej