Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix "ERROR: no fileid for"
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1402162037210.18199@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140216181018.GA20118@host2.jankratochvil.net>

Hi Jan,

> ping: I expect you are fine with this "incomplete" fix so I will check it in.

 Yes, I am.

> > > Can you provide a more elaborate log of your test session?
> > 
> > $ echo 'set gdbserver_reconnect_p 1' >test.exp;runtest test.exp
> > 
> > > What are the exact conditions for this problem to trigger?
> > 
> > If GDB does not run and the testsuite tries to close down it errors.
> > 
> > 
> > >  I'm asking because I fear your change could defeat the purpose of the 
> > > commit you referred to if there's a catastrophic failure causing GDB to 
> > > crash while running gdb.base/solib-disc.exp -- in such a case an instance 
> > > of gdbserver would stay behind running, ruining the remaining part of the 
> > > test suite in environments where only a single TCP port is available for 
> > > the RSP connection.
> > 
> > If GDB has crashed then gdb_spawn_id still exists (although it does not work).
> > So my patch does not change anything.  And also currently it will leave the
> > stale gdbserver running anyway.

 Correct.  I wasn't sure of the spawn ID situation, thanks for the 
clarification.

> > In general if gdb_spawn_id does not exist then send_gdb + gdb_expect just do
> > not make sense anyway.  So this patch just prevents the error in such case.

 I'm still curious as to the actual use for such a scenario, but from the 
corectness POV your fix is valid indeed.

> > The killing of stale gdbserver could be improved multiple ways (also as
> > suggested by Pedro in the original thread) but that is IMO outside of the
> > scope of this patch.  Apparently if there is no good response from GDB then
> > gdb_finish() should try to call gdb_start just to kill that gdbserver, IIUC.

 So do I.  Thanks for your fix and apologies for the delay.

  Maciej


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-16 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-06 20:58 Jan Kratochvil
2014-02-06 22:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-02-07 15:10   ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-02-16 18:10     ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-02-16 20:45       ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2014-02-16 20:51         ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.1402162037210.18199@tp.orcam.me.uk \
    --to=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox