From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19308 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2012 23:14:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 19300 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2012 23:14:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:14:44 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SuXGU-0007g7-Mv from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:14:42 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.106]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:14:42 -0700 Received: from [172.30.4.73] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:14:40 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:14:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Joel Brobecker , Philippe Waroquiers , Pedro Alves , Subject: Re: [patchv2] Write bpt at the ON_STACK bpt address In-Reply-To: <20120726212339.GA1710@host2.jankratochvil.net> Message-ID: References: <20120723155951.GA24718@adacore.com> <20120723163513.GA1222@host2.jankratochvil.net> <1343074047.2209.23.camel@soleil> <20120723201611.GA19567@host2.jankratochvil.net> <1343075809.2209.53.camel@soleil> <501009AE.40901@redhat.com> <1343247870.2240.29.camel@soleil> <20120725212653.GC2767@adacore.com> <1343252775.2240.51.camel@soleil> <20120725223933.GD2767@adacore.com> <20120726212339.GA1710@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00651.txt.bz2 On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > Philippe, do you have an easy enough way to regression test it on mips when > you was asking for the mips fix? mips has many execution modes as I see. Thanks for cc-ing me, I'll push it through regression testing on MIPS16 and microMIPS targets that are usually the most interesting (in addition to some regular MIPS ones). Please note that this will be with the ISA-bit patch being reviewed applied; it does not make much sense to do any MIPS16/microMIPS testing without it as the results are too poor to accept, including in particular manual function calls being considered, and it also takes insane amounts of time for all the failing test cases to get past the timeouts. Does it need native testing or is remote testing enough to cover it? As a side note I'll try to find some time in the next couple of days to give 7.4.91 some testing too -- to see if there wasn't anything that may have escaped at the last moment. Regrettably I've been swamped with other stuff recently. Maciej