From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1206072025490.23962@tp.orcam.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120530220433.GR5492@adacore.com>
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > [Jan] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00357.html 1/2
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00358.html 2/2
> > - This is not a regression of GDB itself but it is a regression of the whole
> > GNU toolchain. There is missing some protection against stale breakpoints
> > on stack (ON_STACK) after longjmps/throws (I do not remember it much now).
> > I use in Fedora these patches.
> >
> > [Jan] workaround stale frame_info * ( http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13866 )
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-04/msg00058.html
> > - some proper fix will almost sure not get into 7.5 so maybe to fix "finish"
> > crashes the workaround could be even applied for FSF GDB HEAD?
> > I use in Fedora this workaround.
>
> Thanks for the heads up, Jan. Looks like me might want to delay
> the branch. I can't remember that Doug said he was done on his end.
>
> There is no real hurry until the end of the month. After that,
> my schedule gets really tight again, pretty much until mid-september.
> I still expect to be able to make the branch, and possibly produce
> the release, but I might not be able to push for regular updates
> the way I like to do...
Ouch, that's a tad inconvenient to me, I had hoped for the branch to have
been made so that the MIPS changes I'm working on right now can be safely
applied to trunk without the risk of disturbing the upcoming release.
That includes the floating-point changes currently on my plate -- these
already published and some more stuff still ongoing. Plus the ISA bit
discussion.
I do understand the importance of the issues concerned by Jan of course,
but I also feel like deferring the MIPS stuff for a month and likely more
is going to get me distracted too much by something else, so given the
circumstances may I kindly ask people to have a look into my proposal and
request for discussion about the generic parts of the ISA bit changes as
posted here:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-05/msg00515.html
(of course any comments about the MIPS parts are welcome as well, but
these bits I am pretty much confident about).
While this is still possibly too brave a change to be included in 7.5 at
such a short notice, I think it will make sense to start the discussion
now rather than later, so that it won't be another month after 7.5 has
branched before it can finally go in. Thanks!
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 18:17 Joel Brobecker
2012-05-11 18:43 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-14 14:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-20 15:40 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-20 20:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-20 21:25 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-20 21:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-20 22:49 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-25 16:52 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-28 20:26 ` x32 ABI Support (was Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release)) Mark Kettenis
2012-05-28 21:18 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-31 18:18 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-05 12:58 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-05 13:16 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-06-09 14:30 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-10 21:52 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-06-11 13:42 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-12 21:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-06-13 20:29 ` x32 ABI Support (committed) Mark Kettenis
2012-06-13 20:41 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-12 15:26 ` Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release) Doug Evans
2012-05-20 14:59 ` Doug Evans
2012-06-11 15:35 ` Branching time + 1 week (was: "Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release)") Joel Brobecker
2012-06-11 15:52 ` Doug Evans
2012-06-11 16:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-21 20:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-21 20:25 ` Doug Evans
2012-06-22 14:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-06-22 16:32 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-22 16:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-06-22 17:38 ` Branching time + 1 week Tom Tromey
2012-06-22 20:31 ` Branching time + 1 week (was: "Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release)") Joel Brobecker
2012-06-24 9:14 ` [commit] gnulib update [Re: Branching time + 1 week] Jan Kratochvil
2012-06-22 16:42 ` Branching time + 1 week (was: "Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release)") H.J. Lu
2012-06-11 15:59 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-11 16:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-11 16:20 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-29 17:17 ` Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release) Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-30 22:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-07 19:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2012-06-11 14:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-12 15:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.1206072025490.23962@tp.orcam.me.uk \
--to=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox