From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4506 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2012 22:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 4494 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2012 22:12:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dair.pair.com (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:12:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 6665 invoked by uid 20157); 23 Mar 2012 22:12:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Mar 2012 22:12:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:12:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: Mike Frysinger cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: make sure to include strsignal prototype In-Reply-To: <201203231143.18540.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <1332476592-12930-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <201203231143.18540.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00810.txt.bz2 On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2012 01:24:07 Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Another thing I noticed: could you please adjust the > > sim/testsuite/sim/cris/c/ tests too? Lots of "program stopped > > with signal" there; your earlier fixes seems to have been just > > to the asm/ subdir. > > i fixed the ones that failed when i did `make check-sim`. wasn't ignoring the > other ones, just didn't notice. i can fix them up too. Yes; a grep will find them. Thanks. > > I'm not putting it on you to assemble a > > cris-elf toolchain to verify it (not that it shouldn't be > > obvious :) just do the same transformation as in asm/. > > i think last time i tried to build a cris toolchain it failed horribly so i > gave up Ok, I'll bite: FWIW, my autotester for cris-elf+cris-sim is humming along with *no* test-suite regressions for the gcc-4.7 branch@185744. For gcc trunk@185744 there are *three* regressions since about 2007, but all general, PR's open. Updates of sim, binutils newlib happen automatically when there are no gcc regressions and there's a clean update. Then again, there are some general newbie obstacles when you build a *-elf + *-sim toolchain from scratch for simulator testing, though generally none target-specific... Well ok, there's one caveat: you need dejagnu-1.5 or a debian-derived dist (has all submitted baseboard files including the needed cris-sim.exp) if you don't want to mess with local dejagnu baseboard files. brgds, H-P