From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 17.2 release update -- 2026-04-25
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 07:16:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af3wUR7X51NachRK@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lddudyy1.fsf@redhat.com>
Hi Andrew,
> On these last two issues, I took a look at Tom's patches, and ended up
> posting an alternative proposal (to both issues) here:
>
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1777645161.git.aburgess@redhat.com
>
> I let Tom know, and he seems generally happy with this proposal, see:
>
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/4300deb1-765a-48fe-9d3f-69122748547d@suse.de
>
> though this wasn't a full approval for the patches.
Thanks for the update and your help with this issue.
> My take is that these two bugs should NOT hold up the 17.2 release.
> They have both existed ever since the debuginfod prompt was added back
> in GDB 12, so holding up this point release seems pretty arbitrary.
>
> In addition, triggering this bug is (IMHO) pretty unlikely (though not
> impossible), but more importantly, it can only trigger early in a debug
> session. Once the user has done something to trigger the debuginfod
> prompt they are "safe" from this bug, which means the pain of living
> with this is 17.2 (as with all earlier releases) is pretty low; yes GDB
> might crash, but the user will not have done much in their session by
> that point, so they'll not have lost much.
That was my sentiment as well. We kept the patches on the list
with a possible hold of a week or two on the premisse that we already
had patches up for review and that the fix was very safe. Now that
the story looks little more complex, and with your added context about
how long this issue has been present, means it no longer makes sense
to hold the 17.2 release up.
I will create the release tomorrow or Sunday.
--
Joel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-25 19:10 Joel Brobecker
2026-05-08 9:37 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-05-08 14:16 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af3wUR7X51NachRK@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox