From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127657 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2017 18:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 126662 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2017 18:15:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:15:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8F0C047B89; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25DC60F8A; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [pushed] Fix gdb.base/starti.exp racy test (Re: [PATCH v3] Add a 'starti' command.) To: John Baldwin References: <20170911220803.73819-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <81036fde-a756-594f-d347-e895b5f47037@redhat.com> <1843904.BBIb0LEcEJ@ralph.baldwin.cx> Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1843904.BBIb0LEcEJ@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2 On 11/16/2017 05:35 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, November 16, 2017 12:38:13 PM Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 11/16/2017 10:53 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>> Sounds like the sort of trouble you'd get if an earlier "(gdb)" >>> prompt was left in expect's buffer, somehow. >> >> Yup, that was (part of) it. I've pushed in the patch below. > > Thanks for the fix and the explanation. You're most welcome. Pedro Alves