From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id EMMlNLZRdGB5EgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:57:10 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D20B61F104; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:57:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4EBC1E54D for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:57:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996C43A07032; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:57:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 996C43A07032 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1618235829; bh=9sWvvdZTpv10tFMHmOypBSYEGExO7a6vYOAXjH7eyF8=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=AVy266S4qLsVu0+D6W6CiejTVORj3ks1a0UB7rTNA5ovNVwCuQF/pfHy+d440Yb2b Ep/xgcTNUOgGtCN0FUZv9/496Rs+xejRJ191696uxdlQMBWlsAiDAWt+nJQcBJguD7 7plEBIVwmWGvwzZNAI8H/YRntKEsTUggCd3ea6cY= Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23237388A410 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:57:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 23237388A410 Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id b139so8154188qkc.10 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:57:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9sWvvdZTpv10tFMHmOypBSYEGExO7a6vYOAXjH7eyF8=; b=oftAyloK5B6zd1ckPP1nyyhU2dNn1R7lUyvV6Lgmyqtr7FZt12dtZSKr3KQBALILaP 7UD0aDIHqJOfcWZrjkXZUZm+tA1PS8cIdvYJdBHa+dAA121zNGAU66f1VeOwUx4nUgLi qOIFDuuYcbB4iRaWv+GYg0LgOE7AtYgKwkKkJ1OP8fnZvmYdacTd/M2MbGOtfpNdheYO zLwnmDsjvxOqrpVz8F7nsWkuN+tnGyvRKmYxmtDXJnZGXDOrUxOM9Px6UGts2dtBhOtT tvkwB0VOzlSh5VYaPAGbBQu22L6rKe59jz2umrl6tNUPVXyXTdOhlilJrPxCkPAiSgJC 0lGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pw9bmM5+/bFt4TNii+NAOQaGEUMRdR07ipPfIWT1Lrc3iG2a5 WSa2LEk3AhljAIEB/p+WTCMDoRVeLnjXYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIx3K+ABrkT8kgSD5CpHKhhNqicZJIQWwEt4O+1p6xTAJo4hIkkRXklVxublAmiESInb3PPA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:22c3:: with SMTP id o3mr26942148qki.220.1618235826624; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:7f0:4841:2841:bdd4:355d:8be9:6e9f? ([2804:7f0:4841:2841:bdd4:355d:8be9:6e9f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 205sm128457qke.8.2021.04.12.06.57.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb, gdbserver: remove WinCE support code To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210410231021.1232451-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:57:03 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210410231021.1232451-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Luis Machado Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 4/10/21 8:10 PM, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote: > The support for WinCE was removed with commit 84b300de3666 ("gdbserver: > remove support for ARM/WinCE"). There is some leftover code for WinCE > support, guarded by the _WIN32_WCE macro, which I didn't know of at the > time. > > I didn't remove the _WIN32_WCE references in the tests, because in > theory we still support the WinCE architecture in GDB (when debugging > remotely). So someone could run a test with that (although I'd be > really surprised). Is there value in supporting remote-based debugging of WinCE if we're dropping gdbserver support? Should we also drop the GDB and testing parts given this won't likely be exercised anytime soon if there's no maintainer?