From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129079 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2016 23:19:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129059 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2016 23:19:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:fc83, Hx-languages-length:659 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:19:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C174C8FCE6; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn03.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.3]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAANJNKS029366; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:19:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFA 14/20] Use gdbpy_enter in gdbpy_before_prompt_hook To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1478816387-27064-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <1478816387-27064-15-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:19:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1478816387-27064-15-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 LGTM. A suggestion below. On 11/10/2016 10:19 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > if (prompt == NULL) > - goto fail; > + { > + gdbpy_print_stack (); > + return EXT_LANG_RC_ERROR; > + } > } > } > } > @@ -1068,13 +1072,7 @@ gdbpy_before_prompt_hook (const struct extension_language_defn *extlang, > if (prompt != NULL) > set_prompt (prompt.get ()); I haven't applied the patch locally, but I suspect this set_prompt call could move to the tail of the nested ifs, where you could return EXT_LANG_RC_OK unconditionally, and then the bottom could just unconditionally return EXT_LANG_RC_NOP. Thanks, Pedro Alves