From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id SbMjIJlMQWTjYzEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:30:49 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 739841E221; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:30:49 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=yjninFnT; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9D41E0D3 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7F33858421 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:30:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0C7F33858421 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1682001047; bh=Qm3eGRLpq8qXEXFVN7rV8+W2AjGkdWj6YdCY4Ap7zYk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=yjninFnTCd1ZXJsrzGc/7hGeZ9XRNiUw0JeTcJX7acGqlPVC+H3Lcc85nqjZiQKZ4 00kWPSlmMVlrbpwr89Zs+htPNHeJNrJmRoohy5NBhTXrg74UXndSetmto1fbBFLQOY pPg1sZ92BALE6y4oy4lX/KMr8339OkPqX141nTA4= Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B672F3858422 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:30:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B672F3858422 Received: from [192.168.33.46] (modemcable182.219-162-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.162.219.182]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B94461E0D3; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:30:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:30:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [gdb/contrib] Add make-check-all.sh To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Andrew Burgess References: <20230403150957.28921-1-tdevries@suse.de> <20230403150957.28921-2-tdevries@suse.de> <87wn2rc22u.fsf@redhat.com> <97c65614-e1a5-a9cb-b5a3-36020e8ed259@suse.de> <2eef24aa-bbe4-478a-c965-82783d3dea9f@simark.ca> <999c220d-dd64-d6fb-b5ef-912150a4cfd6@suse.de> Content-Language: fr In-Reply-To: <999c220d-dd64-d6fb-b5ef-912150a4cfd6@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 4/20/23 07:43, Tom de Vries wrote: > You say you don't understand the comment, but to me it seems you do so I'm not sure I understand what your concern is. Should the comment be improved, or do you want a change in functionality? I just wasn't sure which username I was expected to pass to those options, I wanted to confirm with you that the intent is to have dedicated systems users for that. So the comment could say that: It is recommended to create users on the local system that will act as "remote host" and "remote target", for the boards that use them. Pass their usernames to --host-user and --target-user. This helps because: - remote host/target boards will use $HOME and leave (potentially lots of) files behind - it enables more strict checking of build/host/target file manipulations. - it prevents a command running on one "machine" to kill or send a signal to a process on another machine > I've tried adding a bit more comments, updated version attached. Thanks, that LGTM. Simon