From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27216 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2017 19:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27156 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2017 19:30:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:30:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx16.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763F761D0E; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0055BF781; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't send queries to the MI interpreter To: Simon Marchi , Simon Marchi References: <20170210163650.10334-1-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <89904751-7015-b272-98c1-33e786f7c356@redhat.com> <85ae4ad9-acdc-c9ba-6606-a7ac2abc7e2e@redhat.com> <0d8bd42f-5964-1ac7-414a-754540db2e95@redhat.com> <71cf7c59-8b3c-595d-b4ec-69f44ae3d6fc@ericsson.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <71cf7c59-8b3c-595d-b4ec-69f44ae3d6fc@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 On 02/10/2017 07:05 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > > Note that we can trigger the same bug you mentioned higher with pagination. For > example, I have a huge list of breakpoints and I do "info break" on UI #1 then on > UI #2. I assume you mean that on UI #2 you do the same. > Pressing enter on UI #1 unblocks UI #2, and the following enter crashes > GDB. So should we also say that pagination is only allowed on the main UI for the > same reasons? Yes, I think so. The branch disabled it too, see filtering_enabled. Thanks, Pedro Alves