From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +6JkJoVK7WJNViEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 12:51:17 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8DB681EA05; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 12:51:17 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=lXq6Ztwv; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4062E1E9EB for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 12:51:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62358385AC31 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:51:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 62358385AC31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1659718276; bh=j/DZdOXpCAvaFGIbOKiL+xf2yRh/ISC9yUJlSX15go8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=lXq6ZtwvLrz53PMNj+l512INH+9dxHBsSq1OgE82ShbHJFV5TNyrMxzzgo01mgY4y n4K2dFykTemPjW2Y67ydgE/iAgsOQmaCzhp4zC7ZXjxC3fClQS9siDJUQBK+UcWACF iY9OAU+NFU8TCUGAo1k0qtLuVbrDo9yNN2mrEVvE= Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB113858294 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:50:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1EB113858294 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8162300089; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 01:50:51 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Rewrite gdbarch registry Content-Language: en-US To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220610212657.1170222-1-tom@tromey.com> <87k07ng6bi.fsf@tromey.com> In-Reply-To: <87k07ng6bi.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tsukasa OI via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tsukasa OI Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2022/08/05 4:24, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > Tom> This series is based on the registry rewrite series. > Tom> While working on -Wshadow (which I think is probably a failure -- I'll > Tom> send a separate email), I noticed that gdbarch has its own registry > Tom> implementation. This series rewrites it to use the (rewritte) > Tom> registry.h instead. > > Tom> Regression tested (including using address sanitizer) on x86-64 > Tom> Fedora 34. > > I've also tested this with AddressSanitizer. > I'm going to check it in now. > > Tom I regret to inform you that a bug is found on {riscv64,x86_64}-unknown-elf. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29449 NOTE: NO NEED TO REVERT. If I have completed the copyright assignment, that was easy (I just requested the form recently). But I think fixing this bug is not hard. I think the information I posted is sufficient to make a patch. Best regards, Tsukasa