From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60740 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2019 15:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 60727 invoked by uid 89); 11 Apr 2019 15:59:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:669, beautifully X-HELO: mail-wr1-f41.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f41.google.com) (209.85.221.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:59:27 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id g3so8033444wrx.9 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm40261567wrx.5.2019.04.11.08.59.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Add cc-with-dwz.exp add cc-with-dwz-m.exp To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20190410094021.GA20379@delia> <7f934a85-e7c0-a8e5-7107-485a72bc891d@suse.de> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7f934a85-e7c0-a8e5-7107-485a72bc891d@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On 4/11/19 10:35 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 10-04-19 14:11, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Sorry for being dense, but I was completely confused by this >> description for a bit. > No problem, my bad, it's one of those things were I spent some time > investigating what's going whilst not having a clue, and after I find > out what's wrong it seems so obvious I fail to mention it in the > submission... Yeah, an easy trap to fall into. We have a note about that in the contribution checklist. :-) > Updated patch OK for trunk? Yes. The new description looks beautifully clear, thanks! Thanks, Pedro Alves