From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 7rxbCpO2nWoezDEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2026 14:53:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1788720787; bh=wqxEPptyOQqznCap79/G+fTnzoY0bjPGN6ZsnbxjZ/k=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=UOXymNpld32jI5Rvr/P9RGV5nUSYrcD37Se5nOpboe1oCAeR82b1YKuTkimecVqME 5U9Q6+ocPUTv53SCHl4PS/E3cJPEUKoTGIKBqecwjD5YBqe3qKCxuJP46HH12znpz0 74Zqximu96FIF1unXHKj4XcRZieAOnkaYGGjY4g0= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 03C671E09E; Sun, 06 Sep 2026 14:53:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=EI4iTdS7; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:6:3111::32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40AB21E033 for ; Sun, 06 Sep 2026 14:53:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3194BC7EE1 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 18:53:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C3194BC7EE1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=EI4iTdS7 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668094BB1C15 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 18:52:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 668094BB1C15 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 668094BB1C15 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1788720762; cv=none; b=L9GRZYpr3VAvKy8a4tjy6tilNddOKaFcB5YydBZj593nYW/Vs7jalRXV3a+AFNFputpAKSsNJrUBM2gauYyWR4ajTlxuzEaeDxb73UJh1kJh7t2gLUB19jt3f0zpU2JhSwEcMqxTjJFvS6gekpdixSwlWSUqd8dfXAEdBMVZYyE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1788720762; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wqxEPptyOQqznCap79/G+fTnzoY0bjPGN6ZsnbxjZ/k=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=ucrHqAQGLaNGe85UTZcBt3nkMv95SLAp5odcyoCIR6CsLyQ4befjAp5m6SLWNaGaKdPtLTXYUZjbgUvoYmq2qRcxVRBq71bB/CEJkYPAkWWeoXwYJ+PILz1OIGbxvG9OtmmOzbR7gOIrXMccaKNQoU5g22uZLO/95ROINimBF74= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=EI4iTdS7 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 668094BB1C15 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1788720760; bh=wqxEPptyOQqznCap79/G+fTnzoY0bjPGN6ZsnbxjZ/k=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=EI4iTdS7YHR6h579+l+JcIWfj4wOs3CxpK2ULZpc2VhtgCu4pZG8vpP19O4fuDwm8 6dEKEjN0e3IVuirdjn2vC+7C/jpZnVf1nei60zswL7DQ9DSXMuKT5x33gecwH4BAgK YL8qPRzHCy8q40lCjvtYSjWvEY+DOU+dxcd3ah08= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 821581E033; Sun, 06 Sep 2026 14:52:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2026 14:52:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp: Increase timeout values To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20260906040140.158197-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <20260906040140.158197-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2026-09-06 00:01, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > In the three Linux machines I tested (my x86_64 laptop and two aarch64 > servers), gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp has this timeout failure: > > FAIL: gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp: pretty print type instance flags (timeout) > > And the slower aarch64 server also has this one: > > FAIL: gdb.gdb/python-helper.exp: start inner gdb (timeout) > > Fix these failures by using timeout factors. For the latter, a 2x factor > is enough. For the former, I needed 8x. It appears that the "pretty print > type instance flags" test is quite demanding. Out of curiosity, is this with GDB build at -O0 or -O2 (or something else)? With ASan or other instrumentation? I am asking because if it's -O2, then it's representative of what a user would have in their hands. If some commands take a minute to run, then we could at least check if it's because GDB is doing something terribly inefficient. Simon