From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75110 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2019 08:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 75067 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2019 08:54:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=day X-HELO: mail-wr1-f66.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f66.google.com) (209.85.221.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:54:53 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id n9so31508185wru.0 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 01:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q10sm30689843wrf.32.2019.07.19.01.54.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] new-ui command under windows using NamedPipe To: Andrew Burgess References: <7c1c5343-3171-d454-8507-507d5b8a24a5@redhat.com> <20190719085035.GX23204@embecosm.com> Cc: LABARTHE Guillaume , gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190719085035.GX23204@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 On 7/19/19 9:50 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote: >> I tried it on GNU/Linux and things still work. >> >> I ran all the MI tests with forced new-ui, with: >> >> $ make check TESTS="gdb.mi/*.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="FORCE_MI_SEPARATE_UI=1" >> >> and saw no regressions. > > Are all of these special flags for testing documented anywhere? Every > now and then someone will mention some new flag that I've never seen > before and I always think that one day it might be helpful... Yes, in gdb/testsuite/README: ~~~~ FORCE_SEPARATE_MI_TTY Setting FORCE_MI_SEPARATE_UI to 1 forces all MI testing to start GDB in console mode, with MI running on a separate TTY, on a secondary UI started with "new-ui". ~~~~ Thanks, Pedro Alves