From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51628 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2018 20:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 51510 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2018 20:31:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=month X-HELO: smtp.polymtl.ca Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (HELO smtp.polymtl.ca) (132.207.4.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:31:18 +0000 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wARKVBdm017470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:31:16 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 730E91E93F; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:31:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D001E473; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:31:10 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:31:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, vapier@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sim/opcodes: Allow use of out of tree cgen source directory In-Reply-To: <20181127202712.GA18841@embecosm.com> References: <0745ff244d76a8cd8ec7e7b9a53840f3773a139d.1541525137.git.andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <20181127112112.GC2834@embecosm.com> <6f1e8a0d0901e5c97842fc153f992d3a@polymtl.ca> <20181127202712.GA18841@embecosm.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 On 2018-11-27 15:27, Andrew Burgess wrote: > * Simon Marchi [2018-11-27 14:47:31 -0500]: > >> On 2018-11-27 06:21, Andrew Burgess wrote: >> > Not as far as I can tell. I left it in just in case, but as far as I >> > can tell there's no way to "install" CGEN. I'd be happy to drop the >> > ../lib/cgen references (the else block) completely, and then validate >> > that we have a CGEN source tree or error.... But the above seemed like >> > the least invasive change. >> >> From what I understand from you description, there's no way it could >> have >> been useful... but again, it's not hard to leave it there just to be >> safe. >> It's not my decision anyway :). > > Right now I more worried that the only SIM maintained hasn't been seen > on either the GDB list or the binutils list in months, and despite > being included on the to/cc list, hasn't followed up on this mail. > > Still, it's not been a month yet, so I'm sure it will all work itself > out :) > >> By the way, maybe this should still be sent to binutils for the >> opcodes >> part? > > I originally posted to the binutils list, and had the opcodes part > approved. They pointed out that the sim/ part needed to be posted > here. Ah sorry, I didn't catch it was already approved, good! Simon