From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63504 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2017 16:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 63389 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2017 16:15:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=segments X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:15:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F4181240; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0CGFe6O010050; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:15:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add -file-list-shared-libraries MI command To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Laperle?= , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1473712054-30417-1-git-send-email-marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com> <1473712054-30417-3-git-send-email-marc-andre.laperle@ericsson.com> <176aae27-f7c3-c563-141d-35eb1f69ee02@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 On 01/04/2017 05:18 PM, Marc-André Laperle wrote: > Perhaps the best way > forward would be to make all attributes the same as "=library-loaded" > but also add the from/to. I think so too. > To make the MI more future proof, it could be a list of from/to segments > instead, but for now it will only one segment. What do you think? That's a good idea. I like it. Thanks, Pedro Alves