From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id gOn4BlI6S2gYdQsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:36:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1749760594; bh=nixva/UTWcQctWhc8/qoulRWewLJvVL9/LD9DlNJVPU=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=CTyAgUesHDXUcnDRM6mafmwaRZlgq1prYQ/SrFoSBMrzTuCI95hzp3kr1v6jSBt4s inx106gB76m279z2aXZW0HbWXdp1qmIKa68yScn83AmGnhcRraNQFrQTAPkLjx46Fy c+yUVcpbf/Gk8q+lD4g0VbVucUMOMwFJ2WkS8WE0= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 16C001E102; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:36:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=tieZwuE0; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Cn+xeblf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DEE11E0C2 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:36:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1F33817D89 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:36:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B1F33817D89 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=tieZwuE0; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Cn+xeblf Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5E0381F5ED for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:33:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3E5E0381F5ED Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3E5E0381F5ED Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749760408; cv=none; b=kS7qqTINfppW62zSAFRkKDsFRDcOC1gtvz3H3lkpzAKzhHttIfk7XHlSORXDhP63jnML1n2HD8TAeDWWScJWJAvnn6woLBIQB9Ei8OEBXXkuEwCgywc+xlYTesTfoz+jQS1Zm9kMqdsdMdfrV4z4PDr4dQIqtu6FXvqc80z6qz0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749760408; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nixva/UTWcQctWhc8/qoulRWewLJvVL9/LD9DlNJVPU=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Subject:From:To; b=JJ/CLyLe4WxQnWVI7635drOHewTbqBarT+m8Hs6ZkEIN6vf+C/ckPS2rPl9pc4vAFAjKrytndIAPfJuWg9mNKsVE0ShnnQeqoe357o41NW4jWFxsm2/E4GeCNpue4ScFiS2A1vld9A24plzis3AOvhHiCJkxS1gASslUteNR8MM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E5E0381F5ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1749760407; bh=nixva/UTWcQctWhc8/qoulRWewLJvVL9/LD9DlNJVPU=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tieZwuE0SEd9UHvOCxYfx7MdiburRHgBeKIKpc6lQZU8qxICsgW53eTgTmbkYS7K2 fNi5vku4jnIRg0xVDrXEaTl+6PcOFDJcEQqVdRb05iXECwExHIDwr4OL+i6VOQCXeO 1FE53x34n2cia3dlIWZK/qHNBiLpV/iuDz+5Pn94= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C94931E126; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:33:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1749760406; bh=nixva/UTWcQctWhc8/qoulRWewLJvVL9/LD9DlNJVPU=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Cn+xeblfJW/MdcUmXU7KMSFH8aiDKh5GS0AqzZlnTUcoPF2czqHpvp3/wnaDnLaV+ 60S9q+/JiqI2jzOdCzuHiPtTAGXczj01aws91zza8a3ICuSNIui+Mo0Wltpw5pA5cE vYaDF5xX55Yc4ebW9Lnj7Jx6T0NFYZCLMwznu7aQ= Received: from [10.0.0.11] (modemcable238.237-201-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.237.238]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76F901E0C2; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:33:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb/alpha: Add target description support From: Simon Marchi To: Yodel Eldar Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250526151219.399450-1-yodel.eldar@gmail.com> <20250526151219.399450-2-yodel.eldar@gmail.com> <55cdf445-fee8-4e70-99c0-6d42eb68cd7d@simark.ca> <9feb7348-1dde-40cc-b21d-97671b8b3e39@gmail.com> <3ef4c598-28d8-4c66-844d-58e5629415ab@gmail.com> <40cede5f-1b8c-4eb9-b702-3805499efbf5@gmail.com> <869aca3b-78ab-4ec6-af23-56394c040d75@simark.ca> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <869aca3b-78ab-4ec6-af23-56394c040d75@simark.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 2025-06-12 16:30, Simon Marchi wrote: > Thanks for the detailed investigation. I'm not super familiar with > register descriptions and the register numbering. I think it's better > to be on the safe side and leave it there, it shouldn't bother anybody. > > From my non-Alpha-expert point of view, the series LGTM, so I'm tempted > to approve it. Maciej, did you have some comments on the code? Does it > look good to you? However, do you have a copyright assignment on file with the FSF? This is required in order to contribute any non-trivial code. If not, please see: https://gitweb.git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=doc/Copyright/request-assign.future;hb=HEAD Simon