From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id /QgPLp7JjmD3JQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 02 May 2021 11:47:42 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AF60A1F11C; Sun, 2 May 2021 11:47:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229061E54D for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 11:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86610383303D; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:47:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 86610383303D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619970461; bh=Iztq9+qdIGeHI01073OEXXzz+5wsyT7MpswdxGEqlYU=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=adJzegvUmz47/80tOoFt01KZAgRJ6u3tFS7MwZa4YF6KeXU0uEy+iTyZLIRVSi0FI 7rD6Cl99H3TZ+WyTNPUq8IwXg8oX81zUcjb/mSMojrKa4jJm55SRYvRKweLbudZYaE aAoVrlM4KW9Q/Qe9At3ou3D5vpowcTyqUHvQZU5g= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C331A3833036 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:47:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C331A3833036 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EDAD3408A6; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 11:47:37 -0400 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnulib: import getline Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210501220936.30972-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <533969a7-d2fe-cdbd-40dc-e77eab30a469@polymtl.ca> <838s4x8v5u.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmy96vkb.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8dt6tvs.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83o8dt6tvs.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 02 May 2021 18:24, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 11:12:34 -0400 > > From: Mike Frysinger > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > > > and sf.net/p/mingw hasn't been updated in almost a decade. > > > > > > That's a stale URL. The up-to-date one is here: > > > > > > https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/releases/ > > > > > > The latest release was on April 12. > > > > the project needs to get its act together then and setup redirects. the > > SF page is the top search results and people are still going there, and > > it's seeing tons of downloads per week from it. > > The first line of https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/ says: > > This project is in the process of moving to osdn.net/projects/mingw, > you can continue to follow us there. text easily lost in the overall noise of that one page. their homepage isn't set. their wiki link goes to the dead domain. their support page goes to the old trackers or the dead domain. their releases page has no readme info. their news page has no info. they're clearly half-assing and/or understaffed. normal for open source, but i don't think anyone should be surprised when users think mingw hasn't been updated in ages, and why mingw64 was forked and has since become the more canonical implementation. -mike