From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id gfigC2nBjmAWJQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 02 May 2021 11:12:41 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 22ADB1F11C; Sun, 2 May 2021 11:12:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0161E54D for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 11:12:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFF6383303D; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:12:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0FFF6383303D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619968360; bh=E5mN/pR/zjszuCeoXeinD6rh/lNRQOUQo2xXBXDhH7s=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=hdkE9pDANfzucAQnKZfawU+il0mHh/UYniOCOj22jiMepY82/71cS4pOtMcriTxCl ROFiiRoWIgGstLAtwgCqVm/apMwHDP79m4k+kOVAmMxxoNFAd/qxraYNd8rOYV4RlO SIc+PJPQ4mDHWxbIONEV1qYdtpCUuncv3gvWSkas= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC44F383303D for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:12:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org BC44F383303D Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B916340B28; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 11:12:34 -0400 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnulib: import getline Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210501220936.30972-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <533969a7-d2fe-cdbd-40dc-e77eab30a469@polymtl.ca> <838s4x8v5u.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmy96vkb.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83pmy96vkb.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 02 May 2021 17:48, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > From: Mike Frysinger > > On 02 May 2021 10:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches > > > > getline is in POSIX, but not all targets support it. e.g. Windows > > > > (mingw) omit it. > > > > > > Which MinGW? mingw.org's MinGW does have getline and getdelim. > > > > mingw.org doesn't exist anymore > > Of course it does. if you mean it as a project name and not a domain name, OK. if you mean as a domain name, then no, it does not. it's a domain squatter. > > and sf.net/p/mingw hasn't been updated in almost a decade. > > That's a stale URL. The up-to-date one is here: > > https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/releases/ > > The latest release was on April 12. the project needs to get its act together then and setup redirects. the SF page is the top search results and people are still going there, and it's seeing tons of downloads per week from it. > > we switched to http://mingw-w64.org/ for 64-bit support. > > That's fine, but for 32-bit code they are not the only game in town. ok, but there's not a lot of value in a dying platform. if the project doesn't support 64-bit, then it's of limited value. -mike