Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Zoran Zaric <Zoran.Zaric@amd.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/43] Add new register access interface to expr.c
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 23:52:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEa4syRncTPlMiFW@Plymouth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301144620.103016-19-Zoran.Zaric@amd.com>

Hi,

I have minor style related comments above.

Le Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:45:55PM +0000, Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches a écrit :
> DWARF expression evaluator is currently using get_frame_register_bytes
> and put_frame_register_bytes interface for register access.
> 
> The problem with evaluator using this interface is that it allows a
> bleed out register access. This means that if the caller specifies a
> larger amount of data then the size of a specified register, the
> operation will continue accessing the neighboring registers until a
> full amount of data has been reached.
> 
> DWARF specification does not define this behavior, so a new simplified
> register access interface is needed instead.
> 
> 	* dwarf2/expr.c (read_from_register): New function.
> 	(write_to_register): New function.
> 	(rw_pieced_value): Now calls the read_from_register and
> 	write_to_register functions.
> ---
>  gdb/dwarf2/expr.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c b/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c
> index c50bb3c8d90..5a1fd5b941f 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,96 @@ read_addr_from_reg (struct frame_info *frame, int reg)
>    return address_from_register (regnum, frame);
>  }
>  
> +/* Read register REGNUM's contents in a given FRAME context.
> +
> +   The data read is offsetted by OFFSET, and the number of bytes read
> +   is defined by LENGTH.  The data is then copied into the
> +   caller-managed buffer BUF.
> +
> +   If the register is optimized out or unavailable for the given
> +   FRAME, the OPTIMIZED and UNAVAILABLE outputs are set
> +   accordingly  */
> +
> +static void
> +read_from_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
> +		    CORE_ADDR offset, gdb::array_view<gdb_byte> buf,
> +		    int *optimized, int *unavailable)
> +{
> +  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame);
> +  int regsize = register_size (gdbarch, regnum);
> +  int numregs = gdbarch_num_cooked_regs (gdbarch);
> +  int length = buf.size ();
> +
> +  /* If a register is wholly inside the OFFSET, skip it.  */
> +  if (frame == NULL || !regsize

Gdb coding standard asks for explicit comparison of numbers
(https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20GDB-C-Coding-Standards#Comparison_With_NULL_And_Zero).

!regsize should be regsize == 0.

I guess NULL could also be changed to nullptr.

> +      || offset + length > regsize || numregs < regnum)
> +    {
> +      *optimized = 0;
> +      *unavailable = 1;
> +      return;
> +    }
> +
> +  gdb::byte_vector temp_buf (regsize);
> +  enum lval_type lval;
> +  CORE_ADDR address;
> +  int realnum;
> +
> +  frame_register (frame, regnum, optimized, unavailable,
> +		  &lval, &address, &realnum, temp_buf.data ());
> +
> +  if (!*optimized && !*unavailable)
> +     memcpy (buf.data (), (char *) temp_buf.data () + offset, length);
> +
> +  return;

I changes nothing, but I find it odd to have a return; as last
statement of a void returning function.

> +}
> +
> +/* Write register REGNUM's contents in a given FRAME context.
> +
> +   The data written is offsetted by OFFSET, and the number of bytes
> +   written is defined by LENGTH.  The data is copied from
> +   caller-managed buffer BUF.
> +
> +   If the register is optimized out or unavailable for the given
> +   FRAME, the OPTIMIZED and UNAVAILABLE outputs are set
> +   accordingly. */
> +
> +static void
> +write_to_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
> +		   CORE_ADDR offset, gdb::array_view<gdb_byte> buf,
> +		   int *optimized, int *unavailable)
> +{
> +  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame);
> +  int regsize = register_size (gdbarch, regnum);
> +  int numregs = gdbarch_num_cooked_regs (gdbarch);
> +  int length = buf.size ();
> +
> +  /* If a register is wholly inside of OFFSET, skip it.  */
> +  if (frame == NULL || !regsize

Same remark for regsize.

Thanks,
Lancelot.

> +     || offset + length > regsize || numregs < regnum)
> +    {
> +      *optimized = 0;
> +      *unavailable = 1;
> +      return;
> +    }
> +
> +  gdb::byte_vector temp_buf (regsize);
> +  enum lval_type lval;
> +  CORE_ADDR address;
> +  int realnum;
> +
> +  frame_register (frame, regnum, optimized, unavailable,
> +		  &lval, &address, &realnum, temp_buf.data ());
> +
> +  if (!*optimized && !*unavailable)
> +    {
> +      memcpy ((chr *) temp_buf.data () + offset, buf.data (), length);
> +
> +      put_frame_register (frame, regnum, temp_buf.data ());
> +    }
> +
> +  return;
> +}
> +
>  struct piece_closure
>  {
>    /* Reference count.  */
> @@ -243,22 +333,18 @@ rw_pieced_value (struct value *v, struct value *from)
>  	    if (from == NULL)
>  	      {
>  		/* Read mode.  */
> -		if (!get_frame_register_bytes (frame, gdb_regnum,
> -					       bits_to_skip / 8,
> -					       buffer, &optim, &unavail))
> -		  {
> -		    if (optim)
> -		      mark_value_bits_optimized_out (v, offset,
> -						     this_size_bits);
> -		    if (unavail)
> -		      mark_value_bits_unavailable (v, offset,
> -						   this_size_bits);
> -		    break;
> -		  }
> -
> -		copy_bitwise (v_contents, offset,
> -			      buffer.data (), bits_to_skip % 8,
> -			      this_size_bits, bits_big_endian);
> +		read_from_register (frame, gdb_regnum, bits_to_skip / 8,
> +				    buffer, &optim, &unavail);
> +
> +		if (optim)
> +		  mark_value_bits_optimized_out (v, offset, this_size_bits);
> +		if (unavail)
> +		  mark_value_bits_unavailable (v, offset, this_size_bits);
> +		/* Only copy data if valid.  */
> +		if (!optim && !unavail)
> +		  copy_bitwise (v_contents, offset,
> +				buffer.data (), bits_to_skip % 8,
> +				this_size_bits, bits_big_endian);
>  	      }
>  	    else
>  	      {
> @@ -267,9 +353,8 @@ rw_pieced_value (struct value *v, struct value *from)
>  		  {
>  		    /* Data is copied non-byte-aligned into the register.
>  		       Need some bits from original register value.  */
> -		    get_frame_register_bytes (frame, gdb_regnum,
> -					      bits_to_skip / 8,
> -					      buffer, &optim, &unavail);
> +		    read_from_register (frame, gdb_regnum, bits_to_skip / 8,
> +					buffer, &optim, &unavail);
>  		    if (optim)
>  		      throw_error (OPTIMIZED_OUT_ERROR,
>  				   _("Can't do read-modify-write to "
> @@ -285,9 +370,8 @@ rw_pieced_value (struct value *v, struct value *from)
>  		copy_bitwise (buffer.data (), bits_to_skip % 8,
>  			      from_contents, offset,
>  			      this_size_bits, bits_big_endian);
> -		put_frame_register_bytes (frame, gdb_regnum,
> -					  bits_to_skip / 8,
> -					  buffer);
> +		write_to_register (frame, gdb_regnum, bits_to_skip / 8,
> +				   buffer, &optim, &unavail);
>  	      }
>  	  }
>  	  break;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Lancelot SIX

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-01 14:45 [PATCH 00/43 V2] Allow location description on the DWARF stack Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 01/43] Replace the symbol needs evaluator with a parser Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-27  1:20   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 10:17     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 14:08       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 15:02         ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 15:31         ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 02/43] Cleanup of the dwarf_expr_context constructor Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-27  1:23   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 10:19     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 03/43] Move frame context info to dwarf_expr_context Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-27  2:19   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 10:51     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 14:14       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 15:55         ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 04/43] Remove get_frame_cfa from dwarf_expr_context Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 05/43] Move compilation unit info to dwarf_expr_context Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-27  2:58   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:28     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 06/43] Move dwarf_call " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 07/43] Move get_object_address " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-27  3:12   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:34     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 08/43] Move read_mem " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 09/43] Move push_dwarf_reg_entry_value to expr.c Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-27  3:56   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:36     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 10/43] Inline get_reg_value method of dwarf_expr_context Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 11/43] Remove empty frame and full evaluators Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 12/43] Merge evaluate_for_locexpr_baton evaluator Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  1:33   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:39     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 13/43] Move piece_closure and its support to expr.c Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  1:56   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:40     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 14/43] Make value_copy also copy the stack data member Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  2:01   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:43     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 15/43] Make DWARF evaluator return a single struct value Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  2:21   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 11:47     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 14:24       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 16/43] Simplify dwarf_expr_context class interface Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  2:45   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 13:15     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 14:41       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 15:39         ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 19:19           ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-29 15:49       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-29 15:55         ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 17/43] Add as_lval argument to expression evaluator Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  3:04   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 13:16     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28  3:30   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 18/43] Add new register access interface to expr.c Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-08 23:52   ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-04-28  3:25   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 13:29     ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 14:48       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-04-28 15:42         ` Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 19/43] Add new memory " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-04-30 21:24   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 20/43] Add new classes that model DWARF stack element Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 21/43] Add to_location method to DWARF entry classes Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:45 ` [PATCH 22/43] Add to_value " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 23/43] Add read method to location description classes Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 24/43] Add write " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 25/43] Add deref " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 26/43] Add read_from_gdb_value method to dwarf_location Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 27/43] Add write_to_gdb_value " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 28/43] Add is_implicit_ptr_at " Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 29/43] Add indirect_implicit_ptr to dwarf_location class Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 30/43] Add new computed struct value callback interface Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 31/43] Add to_gdb_value method to DWARF entry class Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 32/43] Change DWARF stack to use new dwarf_entry classes Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 33/43] Remove old computed struct value callbacks Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 34/43] Comments cleanup between expr.h and expr.c Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 35/43] Remove dwarf_expr_context from expr.h interface Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 36/43] Move read_addr_from_reg function to frame.c Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 37/43] Add frame info check to DW_OP_reg operations Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 38/43] Remove DWARF expression composition check Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 39/43] Change back the symbol needs to use the evaluator Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 40/43] Add support for any location description in CFI Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 41/43] Add DWARF operations for byte and bit offset Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 42/43] Add support for DW_OP_LLVM_undefined operation Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches
2021-03-01 14:46 ` [PATCH 43/43] Add support for nested composite locations Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEa4syRncTPlMiFW@Plymouth \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=Zoran.Zaric@amd.com \
    --cc=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox