From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id gCXXClgUGGAeCgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:46:48 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 29C3F1EF80; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:46:48 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F4C1E939 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:46:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A533875411; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:46:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 89A533875411 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1612190807; bh=rgFoMGIn17Nfg9YjNg3h+emg0ylWh4/T7dmaCsqWv/M=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=OQjb6bJRM9GYseP2HEeG7Hjg5Okw0oDj7jMzPRIR+PR+DWD7Ip138aVb5NLTvMbI2 zyBZwfiQ/ozBhFr1xcg2n0tCNxz+xSuhjh+M6Rx7/NW55CAfsjiDwG4LoZb4S1HESJ cg+TvpD4nZNhXYX0i14IMqt0RtJ0Qe1GisHMnOKI= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FCF384B826 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:46:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D7FCF384B826 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2643E340815; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:46:44 -0500 To: Andrew Burgess Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] sim/rx: define sim_memory_map Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 01 Feb 2021 11:44, Andrew Burgess wrote: > The rx simulator doesn't build due to sim_memory_map not being > defined. Define it now to return NULL, this can be extended later to > return an actual memory map if anyone wants this functionality. i build every sim port, and rx was/is building fine for me. nothing in the sim refers to the sim_memory_map, so it failing to build is a bit surprising. do you mean gdb is failing to link instead ? i don't always try to build those for ports as not all have gdb ports. -mike