From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id dTY8HT1yF2BEeAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:15:09 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 69FBB1EF80; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:15:09 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F5E1E945 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:15:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01525384C005; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 03:15:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 01525384C005 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1612149308; bh=FIizc4jzsQQa3s2rZALYqTdQJ2gVx5M13/wRjUg59fM=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=WRT7fa6yHiC8MWdtQDa1/RRV05/OErapzs0/4f6uLldgRkX2w0LmvsA3H0MXEEm34 20VHPfxLof0Ev/lIlbe9X9EW6vnIc03+ZBU67H8NcOW5DsC5nbjTflQQstmIeRAXJq qxq13230uZwv+BwzG3aq5c0h0NNB88OAiYcBxGbY= Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DA138618C3 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 03:15:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 46DA138618C3 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F26E335C38; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 03:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:15:02 -0500 To: Stafford Horne Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sim: testsuite: Get common tests compiling again Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Stafford Horne , GDB patches References: <20171005141745.27758-1-shorne@gmail.com> <20171005141745.27758-2-shorne@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171005141745.27758-2-shorne@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Mike Frysinger Cc: GDB patches Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 05 Oct 2017 23:17, Stafford Horne wrote: > This is a series of changes to the the old and non working sim common > testsuite . As far as I can tell this has not been used since what > looks like before 64-bit desktop computers became common. Most of the > changes here are to convert the test code to be 64-bit portable. sorry for not seeing this sooner. i stumbled across this dir myself recently and came to the same conclusions you did (about the non-fpu stuff). i pushed some fixes to get it working on my 64-bit desktop. i haven't tried to integrate the build though. i was going to let that wait until we had better overall build integration than add some more subdir-configure scripts, then should be able to revisit. > The fpu-tst tool actually depends on external code from v2 of berkeley > softfloat [1] and testfloat [2] libraries which I cleaned up so the > would actually build on a modern compiler. The build will generate a > 'testfloat' binary which will be used to compare the sim-fpu vs the > softfloat implementation. ah, very cool. i saw those includes and thought those were weird but then gave up on trying to track them down. i assumed it was some weird thing that didn't exist anymore. can you refresh these and see how many are still needed ? i think the alu-tst & bits-gen & bits-tst files should be all set now in the latest tree. for the fpu-tst, how about we put the details/comments into the source file itself for now ? -mike