From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id VQGaGHQBamNSLxUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2022 02:12:52 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 59EC81E124; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 02:12:52 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=rTcrp5+8; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 129591E0D3 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 02:12:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812AB3858299 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:12:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 812AB3858299 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1667891566; bh=Js+wJRBpQVcNh5ocyhzAjyePhJcM8tjvnZ6gmsiAAHg=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=rTcrp5+83/a1LundjlPy6Xi14+x92RXlvQzaMC2VNEPenIM8s/VocRsiJcFPhBUvo 4jfX4lUGejYcqLAvLxVr31oi6OpuKSxuky5T+UKAW/O5Z+1aqCWOIC+Ek9DnpKUeaE vWyfnBBMUbO6WoTIPTss62wjyDGhvxDMgg2psyXM= Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BBE43858C55; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 07:12:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7BBE43858C55 Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id o13so3341005pgu.7; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:12:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Js+wJRBpQVcNh5ocyhzAjyePhJcM8tjvnZ6gmsiAAHg=; b=tvZ/d0sWLIGpkCsUepkQI+BHCjciDypsjgWT80Jffr89D5Q8Kt09y6QZak5jTfR687 Oz3wmR6RiIRIrOVWHfQvqPBQ9boLeJxyLOu/t1V18MLpv+Lkqld800ClrrG9I5jn9Hru 8jV2JHWOGo93qRhC2MAon92sNG0cedQVANv/Ipjd04ZjV+nOiOROGHKmKy4noIv5+N2M +JFJ21JQ7y+m6C8g3DemgJ9iHQaU5QZxlXuTbX2uw3Mba/j54np/RpDMPUj7ENegko07 TCgTmT8wpk55nULzMuvGQb6/rlv+m0U0oMxQilkSGkCc6Gu5bWsGrRYmoUf0fBXJwTxf eUVA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0MoTuxcFPfz0PQiz22QsysUloc/8b9AwnRKDppCdWp8SQp9Zvo zDReZdcKFOVzZ+35w4WZeyI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4qzxhk4EcW7soR3iA8ASd4rLpOLVtYAoncPud2dNAY5qRlepHwfowjkx/U/jDNyH5KOsuDZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:53c6:0:b0:46f:cbcb:7402 with SMTP id z6-20020a6553c6000000b0046fcbcb7402mr37413578pgr.366.1667891541470; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from squeak.grove.modra.org (158.106.96.58.static.exetel.com.au. [58.96.106.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x190-20020a6231c7000000b0056bbebbcafbsm5662094pfx.100.2022.11.07.23.12.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:12:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by squeak.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC71E1140234; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:42:17 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:42:17 +1030 To: Joseph Myers Cc: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, bonzini@gnu.org, neroden@gcc.gnu.org, aoliva@gcc.gnu.org, Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de Subject: Re: [RFC][top-level] Add configure test-case Message-ID: References: <20221020151027.GA1300@delia.home> <6a0ccc2-e4ab-c8f0-dffc-cd8f0f1369b@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6a0ccc2-e4ab-c8f0-dffc-cd8f0f1369b@codesourcery.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Alan Modra via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Alan Modra Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 06:23:45PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Alan Modra via Binutils wrote: > > > a) that top-level binutils/gdb patches don't get applied to the gcc > > git repository in a timely manner, or > > If a toplevel patch is approved for either repository, I think you should > treat it as approved for the other one without needing separate review. Thanks Joseph, that's how I see it too. Of course with the understanding that binutils-gdb can't be used as a back door way of sneaking in a gcc-specific change. Can I get agreement among the gcc build maintainers that such a policy is acceptable? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM