From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ZK/EGnftaGO36xQAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 06:35:19 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 601F61E124; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 06:35:19 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=WzQUSIWn; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC90B1E0CB for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 06:35:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDC5385843B for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:35:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AEDC5385843B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1667820913; bh=Ha4WrQXv+qH+48XBQHjEf9XX81MhLDiry66NE9DWCzc=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=WzQUSIWn0n2OppKifWK49q4/O5UyT4JJzRuWdO9R/s1iPeRYqvjjvIpHzjyjKh6SF fImN8nTwXYzDcbgzRHBld0ybdEp9IMcBXOAyysT/Mz5BfoU7j+irugyn3wRUxXhkDq Q46mVpoOvctp15qebx5GU4PvilsCloGSybe81Ftw= Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38BD23858D38; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 11:34:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 38BD23858D38 Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id l6so10320157pjj.0; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 03:34:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Ha4WrQXv+qH+48XBQHjEf9XX81MhLDiry66NE9DWCzc=; b=jg9+FzlJR/FB4E5EHdGfZIRmIRLm6U9YEmR2GOw+eqTb79t5x/yKvcFv7HGfz4LtFH cRQ+hTS7DZ1h725UGkubQEqCMuxPjsHXCQLIv5t78w+aBClqNMU2cR2u4b+Xy+XMu+x5 37wp4c4JAhq8t/0xaINodpX3pinD1tvDuzYzLwFjhzHE2xJCneeuuuATop8DOiW/1blj 3cbAFXbDA3RKJW7kX6HWe/EJXacIRb7fpL28C1YghhpaSrtYYIajsH6BeXKwJmwpp56w MqX2O32W2QrZbsD4WsPpO2QW6ru8EHQkBE73ywioWOwkdaAMvUEwfT1j09TwfgAUu9+y zBiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf14EMuBuya1mt1A121Jmovk9jDaGQ4Til/tmfKNJhfrDE6CDHck JeDpaqIHUvFZbuy11Rwdg4ku9CqjhoM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6RUCPkYpre6n3vNhPp5hbcv9Hbgo/EwnUvZHgEZCUpHaZ7A9BQePZTjXVwse6Bg4vzbAQptw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7301:b0:213:8a08:2f18 with SMTP id m1-20020a17090a730100b002138a082f18mr52001329pjk.50.1667820888305; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 03:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from squeak.grove.modra.org (158.106.96.58.static.exetel.com.au. [58.96.106.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 21-20020a170902c11500b00174c1855cd9sm4747458pli.267.2022.11.07.03.34.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Nov 2022 03:34:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by squeak.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D3E611140234; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 22:04:44 +1030 (ACDT) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 22:04:44 +1030 To: Tom de Vries Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC][top-level] Add configure test-case Message-ID: References: <20221020151027.GA1300@delia.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221020151027.GA1300@delia.home> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Alan Modra via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Alan Modra Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Tom de Vries via Binutils wrote: > Hi, > > As reported in reopened PR18632, recent commit 228cf97dd3c ("Merge configure.ac > from gcc project") dropped commit 69961a84c9b ("Don't build > readline/libreadline.a, when --with-system-readline is supplied"), due to the > patch only being applied to binutils-gdb repo, and not to gcc repo. Sorry about that. > I wondered if I could write a test-case that would regress because of this, > such that we at least don't silently regress. > > I came up with a test-case named toplevel.exp, that can be run like this: While I applaud anything that helps stop Alan making silly mistakes, the real problem is either a) that top-level binutils/gdb patches don't get applied to the gcc git repository in a timely manner, or b) that we try to keep them in sync. Maybe we should just give up on (b)? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM