Re: [PATCH V2] gdb: link executables with libtool

[Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 826 bytes --]

On 05 Nov 2022 12:38, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> On 11/5/22 10:02, Jose E. Marchesi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> >   LIBBACKTRACE_LIB now refers to ../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la
> >   LIBCTF           now refers to ../libctf/libctf.la
> 
> The patch linked in this bug:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29372
> 
> also updated OPCODES to use $(OPCODES_DIR)/libopcodes.la, should you do
> it too?

yeah, and i think we can drop zlib & zstd logic too since they're in there
only for bfd.  less sure about gettext usage ... if gdb uses gettext, we
want to keep it, but if it was pulled in only for bfd too, we can purge it
from the gdb side.

although i'm totally fine with doing the zlib & zstd cleanup as a followup
commit since Jose's patch here improves the status quo.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]