Patch Gdb - target h8300 sim

[Philip Quaife <test12345678@maxnet.co.nz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 615 bytes --]

Hi,
I was given your email as address for patches to gdb. Please advice if you
are not  the correct person.

Problem.

        Gdb version 5.3 target h8300-coff. Machine h8300h. Simulator

Demonstration of fault.

        set machine h8300h
        target sim
        Gdb Abort!
Cause of fault.
        Incorrect definition of number of machine registers in tm-h8300.h
Patch
        diff -c tm-h8300.h tm-h8300.h-orig

Fix is alpha as there is another definition of NUM_REGS in h8300-tdep.c ,
these two need to be merged and integrated into the gdb definitions for h8300
registers.



--
Philip Quaife
Q Solutions


[-- Attachment #2: pwq-h8300-reg.patch-tm-h8300.h --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 825 bytes --]

*** tm-h8300.h	Sat Aug 30 23:21:43 2003
--- tm-h8300.h-orig	Fri Aug 29 23:39:55 2003
***************
*** 100,112 ****
  
  #define REGISTER_SIZE 4
  
! /*
!   PWQ 30/8/03 - TEMPORARY PATCH for Wrong # REGS on h8300h machine 
!   This def is duplicated in h8300-tdep.c ,both should be merged into header 
!   file. Correct number is probably 12
! */
! 
! #define NUM_REGS 13
  
  #define REGISTER_BYTES (NUM_REGS * 4)
  
--- 100,106 ----
  
  #define REGISTER_SIZE 4
  
! #define NUM_REGS 14
  
  #define REGISTER_BYTES (NUM_REGS * 4)
  
***************
*** 318,321 ****
     one that takes account of generic CALL_DUMMY frames */
  #define GET_SAVED_REGISTER(raw_buffer, optimized, addrp, frame, regnum, lval) \
       generic_unwind_get_saved_register (raw_buffer, optimized, addrp, frame, regnum, lval)
- 
--- 312,314 ----