From: "Gerlicher, Klaus" <klaus.gerlicher@intel.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Cc: "Simon.Marchi@amd.com" <Simon.Marchi@amd.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] gdb: reject inserting breakpoints between functions
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 05:38:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN7PR11MB70917FA4EC3CF4803CD19172E8972@SN7PR11MB7091.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61b747ca-adfe-4d06-b36e-5b4d38a769e2@simark.ca>
Hi Simon,
Thanks, I will look at rebasing my patch.
Klaus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 9:02 PM
> To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>; Gerlicher, Klaus
> <klaus.gerlicher@intel.com>; Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
> Cc: Simon.Marchi@amd.com; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: reject inserting breakpoints between functions
>
>
>
> On 2024-08-12 10:54, Simon Marchi wrote:
> > On 8/7/24 4:27 AM, Gerlicher, Klaus wrote:
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> Kindly reminding again about your breakpoint sliding patch.
> >>
> >> I worked a bit with it, I have had one additional issue that would be fixed
> with below patch but of course since your original patch hasn't landed yet I
> can't post this as a real patch.
> >>
> >> So if you want to integrate this to your patch or treat this in another way,
> please let me know.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Klaus
> >
> > Thanks for reminding me... I'll try to come back to this this week.
> >
> > Simon
>
> I went ahead and pushed Andrew's version of my patch, with one
> small change, to use a reference instead of a pointer.
>
> Klaus, can you rebase and re-post your patch?
>
> Simon
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 20:05 Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-06-17 16:25 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches
2022-06-21 17:01 ` Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches
2024-04-30 8:47 ` Klaus Gerlicher
[not found] ` <6630b03f.050a0220.6a68d.6289SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2024-05-01 9:47 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-05-01 18:11 ` Simon Marchi
2024-05-08 14:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-08-07 8:27 ` Gerlicher, Klaus
2024-08-12 14:54 ` Simon Marchi
2024-08-29 19:01 ` Simon Marchi
2024-08-30 5:38 ` Gerlicher, Klaus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN7PR11MB70917FA4EC3CF4803CD19172E8972@SN7PR11MB7091.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=klaus.gerlicher@intel.com \
--cc=Simon.Marchi@amd.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox