Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: update link to Oracle DTrace project

Elena Zannoni
2024-01-19T16:52:21Z

On 1/18/24 05:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: "Sargsyan, Eduard" <eduard.sargsyan@intel.com>
>> CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:14:53 +0000
>>
>> So should we use link from Wikipedia? If we want to be just replace old link, to the "same page" we probably need to use the link I have in the patch, but if we want to stay as far away from brands/commercial entities, then probably link to the Wikipedia is better. But in the second case, document reader will need to go to Wikipedia, then follow to links on the Wikipedia page.
>> Or as an option we can directly use link from Wikipedia: https://dtrace.org/about/
>> Which approach you find more desirable?
>
> I prefer to link to Wikipedia, since that is unlikely to go away. But
> let's hear what others here think about this.

Hi Eli, Eduard,

The docs are indeed on the docs.oracle.com website.

Dtrace.org is not the dtrace for linux work we are doing.

We have a github repo which contains the active development and a
readme.md which explains how to get the various pieces, etc, not sure if
that's is more acceptable: https://github.com/oracle/dtrace-utils

The wikipedia page is pointing to a different CDDL version of dtrace,
which seems to not be in active development.

thanks
elena