Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>]

On 3 Feb 2003, David Carlton wrote:

> I can go with that.  I would assume that the + in 'stabs+' has to be
> set off by @t, but TeXinfo doesn't complain; Eli, should I use stabs+
> or stabs@t{+}?

I'd use either @code{stabs+} or simply stabs+.  The @t{++} in C@t{++} is 
a kind of gimmick, since the C++ language name is a pun on a C operator
++.  There's no such pun in stabs+, AFAIK.

> Here's the next version of the patch; it changes this sentence, and
> also replaces some uses of @samp{-gsomething} by @option{-gsomething},
> which I assume is preferred.

Yes, @option is preferred once we require Texinfo 4.0 or later.

> +an effective form for debug info.  See @ref{Debugging Options,,Options
> +for Debugging Your Program or @sc{gnu} CC, gcc.info, Using @sc{gnu} CC},
> +for more information.

It is better to use "@xref{something}" rather than "See @ref{something}" 
at the beginning of a sentence, since the result will look better in Info 
(a single "*Note" instead of a "See *note").  Sorry I didn't catch this 
earlier.

Otherwise, this is fine; please go ahead and commit it.

Thanks.