From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25103 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2002 10:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25090 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2002 10:08:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 23 Dec 2002 10:08:57 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA13795; Mon, 23 Dec 2002 11:53:15 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 06:59:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Jim Blandy cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [repost] Re: RFC: support debug info in separate files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00635.txt.bz2 On 23 Dec 2002, Jim Blandy wrote: > - The documentation has been completely rewritten, and provides much > more detail. It includes all the information needed to implement Thanks. The doco patch is approved (assuming that the code is accepted). I have a few minor change requests: > + @cindex .debug subdirectories Please use the normal markup in @cindex entries, in this case .debug should be in @file... > + @cindex .gnu_debuglink sections ...and here .gnu_debuglink should be in @code. > + Drepper's @file{elfutils} package, starting with version 0.53, > + contains a version of the @code{strip} command such that the command > + @samp{strip foo -f foo.debug} removes the debugging information from I think it's better to put commands users type in @kbd instead of @samp. But I don't object to @samp if you like it better. > + @kindex gnu_debuglink_crc32 > + @example > + unsigned long > + gnu_debuglink_crc32 (unsigned long crc, unsigned char *buf, size_t len) IIRC, we decided to use @smallexample throughout. Also, the last line above is too long even for @smallexample (will produce overfull hbox warnings from TeX), so please break it into 2 lines. Thanks again for such a clear and concise description.