From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20964-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2872 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2002 06:05:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2861 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2002 06:05:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2002 06:05:37 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA22561;
	Sun, 15 Dec 2002 08:05:23 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 22:18:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Added verbosity to dwarf2*
In-Reply-To: <3DFB79B8.5030306@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021215080339.22353E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2


On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Michal Ludvig wrote:

> -      error ("dwarf cfi error: unsupported target address length.");
> +      error ("dwarf cfi error: unsupported target address length [%s]", 
> +		      bfd_get_filename (abfd));

Wouldn't it be better to say "[in module %s]"?  I'm afraid a BFD file 
name alone won't explain enough to the user.  After all, not everyone who 
uses GDB knows all the module names in their program by heart.