From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3113 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2002 06:17:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3058 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2002 06:17:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2002 06:17:44 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA16046; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:17:15 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:43:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add get_frame_saved_regs() and get_frame_saved_regs_p() In-Reply-To: <3DF7A7C9.9040306@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > This adds accessor methods for the `struct frame_info' field > ->saved_regs. Since get_frame_saved_regs() and > frame_saved_regs_zalloc() are almost equivalent, I also eliminated the > latter. The doco change is okay with me. Thanks.