From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20381-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10281 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 06:19:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10237 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 06:19:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 06:19:38 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA24185;
	Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:19:29 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 22:19:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: HPPA files naming convention...
In-Reply-To: <20021126005631.GC23000@gnat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021126081837.23833E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2


On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> I suggest we transition to a more verbose naming, which should be more
> consistent with the other ports I know. For instance, how about
> hppa-hpux instead of hppah. I hear a netbsd port will probably be done
> in the future, we can then use hppa-netbsd.
> 
> We would use this convention for the files in the config/pa directory
> (tm-hppa-hpux.h, hppa-hpux.mt, etc), and also for for the files in gdb
> (hppa-hpux-tdep.c).
> 
> The part that is indenpedent of the OS would still stay in hppa (eg
> tm-hppa, hppa-tdep.c, etc).

Just remember to update gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst.