From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11808 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2002 05:56:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11796 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2002 05:56:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2002 05:56:20 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA24918; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 07:56:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:56:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] FRAME_FP() -> get_frame_base() In-Reply-To: <3DDA9741.4050001@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > There will be several follow-on patches: > - replace any occurance of frame->frame with get_frame_base(frame) > - delete the identical default_frame_address(), replacing all references > with get_frame_base(). > - (I guess) re-vamp the PPC so that get_frame_base() is constant through > out the lifetime of a frame. I presume some patch to gdbint.texinfo should also follow, right?