From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 325 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2002 06:11:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 318 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 06:11:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 06:11:52 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA13920; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:11:52 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 23:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc; rfa:doco] Add reggroups and their maint commands In-Reply-To: <3DB5F04A.2090005@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Eli, now does the revised doco look? Okay, but I have a couple of comments: > +the raw register cache; the command @samp{maint print cooked-registers} Don't we use @code for command names in the user manual? > +@table @samp > +@item float_reggroup I think @table @code is better here (the quotes produced by @samp in print are redundant). Also, I suggest a "@cindex register groups" in gdbint.texinfo where you describe the related functions. Thanks.