From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23952 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2002 06:39:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23941 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2002 06:39:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Oct 2002 06:39:48 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA04974; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:39:52 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Kevin Buettner cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA/RFC] Address class support In-Reply-To: <1021016184151.ZM2355@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Kevin Buettner wrote: > I just noticed that I neglected to provide ChangeLog entries for the > docs changes. Here they are: > > * gdbint.texinfo (Address Classes): New section. > (Target Conditionals): Document ADDRESS_CLASS_NAME_TO_TYPE_FLAGS, > ADDRESS_CLASS_NAME_TO_TYPE_FLAGS_P, ADDRESS_CLASS_TYPE_FLAGS, > ADDRESS_CLASS_TYPE_FLAGS_P, ADDRESS_CLASS_TYPE_FLAGS_TO_NAME, and > ADDRESS_CLASS_TYPE_FLAGS_TO_NAME_P. Yes, okay. Thanks.