From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18793-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8182 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 11:49:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8175 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 11:49:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 11:49:45 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA01891;
	Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:46:58 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:49:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Should we fix warnings from GCC 2.xx?
In-Reply-To: <je65x2cj1h.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020919134635.867R-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00467.txt.bz2


On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> |> FWIW, I'm still using GCC 2.7.2.1 on one of my machines.
> 
> GCC 2.7 does not have this warning in the first place.

IIRC, it does.