From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5547 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 11:34:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5539 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 11:34:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 11:34:12 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA01728; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:31:10 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:34:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: tromey@redhat.com, Michael Snyder , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: usage of tab in the indentation... In-Reply-To: <3D8141F7.2070805@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Please don't start replacing tabs with spaces. If people don't like the > current emacs/indent behavour then they should persue this on the EMACS > and indent mailing lists. Seconded. In general, gratuitous changes in whitespace should be avoided altogether IMHO, as they make patches and "cvs diff"s hard to read.