From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5238 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 11:32:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5227 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 11:32:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 11:32:44 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA01710; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:29:54 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:32:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc][rfa:doc][rfa;testsuite] Add ``internal-warning'' In-Reply-To: <3D80E5CA.5000504@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2 On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> I'd like gdb.texinfo to tell more about what GDB will print when this > >> command is invoked. Perhaps just give an example. ``behave as though > >> an internal error or warning is being reported'' doesn't sound > >> descriptive enough (it's not like every user is born with a built-in > >> knowledge of that behavior... ;-). > > > > > Makes sense, I'll do both. > > How is this ... Thanks, please commit this.