From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-18341-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27342 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2002 04:54:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27139 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2002 04:54:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2002 04:54:19 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA04157;
	Mon, 2 Sep 2002 06:51:35 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 21:54:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Stephane Carrez <stcarrez@nerim.fr>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Document TUI status line
In-Reply-To: <3D7267AE.3010506@nerim.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020902064931.4092C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2


On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Stephane Carrez wrote:

> This patch documents the TUI status line fields.  I've used @emph for table
> because the items are not printed as is.  Checked on pdf.
> 
> Is it ok to commit?

Yes, with these two minor comments:

 - After this sentence:

   The name is demangled if demangling is turned on.

   I suggest a cross reference to the place where the manual describes 
   how to control demangling.

 - I suggest to say "program counter" instead of "PC", in case the reader 
   is not fluent with the GDB parlance.

Thanks!