From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14697 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2002 05:37:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14690 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2002 05:37:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Sep 2002 05:37:37 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA25294; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:34:53 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 22:40:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Stephane Carrez cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Provide TUI fast key action with specific readline keymap In-Reply-To: <3D70FD20.6020409@nerim.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg01073.txt.bz2 On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Stephane Carrez wrote: > > Thanks for working on this, but you never responded to my request to > > change the manual accordingly. I really don't think we should have > > first-class user-level features that are not documented. > > I agree with you; I responded and I sent the following patch few days ago: > > [RFC]: Document TUI breakpoints and SingleKey mode > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00907.html Sorry, I somehow missed that. Those patches are approved with the following comments: - "@table @emph" is IMHO not a good idea for markers, since @emph is typeset in a slanted font in the printed manual. I suggest to use "@table code" instead. - In the description of the SingleKey keybindings, please make the index entries indicate that those are SingleKey bindings, like this: @kindex c@r{, SingleKey TUI key} Otherwise, the user looking at the index will not be able to distinguish between, say, the entry for the normal GDB `c' (continue) command and the SingleKey binding of `c'. Thanks!